PUBLICATIONS

A Radical Approach to the Vertical Conveyance of Bulk Materials: the Olds Elevator

Please note: This file is in Adobe PDF format. You can download it for free here.


Paper was published in the February 2005 issue of Solids & Bulk Handling (UK)

A REVOLUTIONARY, NON-REVOLUTIONARY SCREW ELEVATOR
Lyn Bates Ajax Equipment Ltd. United Kingdom.

Until recently process engineers had only three modes of transport available to move loose solids and bulk materials by means of helical screws. These were by gravity mode, as widely employed in screw type conveyors, the flood feed form used in screw feeders, and a dynamic mode that operated within screw elevators. Inevitably there are limitations to each of these methods. Process engineers now have an additional tool for elevating solids, a new elevating method that uses a static screw, where the bulk material is moved around the inclined face of the screw flight by the effect of a rotating casing. It works amazingly well.

This new method of elevation has many operating advantages that extend the scope of screw elevators beyond the normal range of application of traditional equipment.

Screw Elevators

Traditional screw elevators are a proven and important part of the process engineer’s armoury when faced with the task of moving bulk materials.

However, they sometimes struggle at steep angles because the screws have to be driven at a speed of rotation to induce a dynamic vortex of bulk material. This is generally effective, but the handling capacity – or product loading – is generally low and the actual performance depends upon the nature and state of the bulk material that is being handled. A product that is dilated to a fluidised condition will not elevate in a standard unit of this type because leakage in the flight tip clearance and run-back down the helix will negate the elevating capacity of the machine. An inherent downside of running the screw at a high speed is that fresh material entering the machine has to generate sufficient flow pressure at the end of an inclined inlet chute to overcome the centrifugal force exerted by the existing contents. Higher speed ultimately becomes self-defeating in a drive for increased capacity, apart from introducing various other problems.

Addressing this difficulty by extending the steepness of the chute or the height of the inlet port enhances the amount of material that is elevated, but increases other drawbacks. Deeper inlets leave more residue in the machine at the end of a run and a greater loading height is needed to feed material into the machine. The design of the inlet configuration is therefore very product sensitive and the ability to pick up product from a low level is severely restricted, as the bottom end seal and bearing add to the ground clearance required.

With the exception of simple, well-proven applications, such as moving grain and plastic pellets, the design of steep screw elevators usually involves some kind of compromise. Mechanical feed devices, such as horizontal screw feeders, can be used to force-feed product into a steep screw elevator, but these introduce significant extra costs to the application.

Static Screw Elevator Design

So it is perhaps not surprising that when Peter Olds, an Australian engineer, was faced with the task of elevating sand to a new moulding machine in his foundry, he found that traditional screw elevators and other conventional devices used for this process fell short of meeting his objectives for an economical, compact, quiet, trouble-free machine.

After assessing his requirements from first principles, Olds reversed the normal mechanism to drive the casing to rotate around a stationary screw, and so developed the ‘Static Screw Elevator’, which was installed and worked well. Various test machines were then made and satisfactory trials have been conducted on products as diverse as peas, beans, bread crumbs, coal fines, dried capsicum, dog biscuits, flour, plastic powder, wet and dry sand, rice, coffee beans, granulated coffee, macadamia nuts, steel shot, peanut kernels various grains and seeds, sugar, wet sulphur slurry, dry sulphur and molasses.

Static Screw Operation

A key to the operation is that scoops on the lower end of the machine casing feeds product into the machine. Material entering the casing impinges on the static screw and fills the clearance between the screw and the casing. A boundary layer of loose product is caused to rotate by contact friction on the casing inner wall and this seals the flight tip clearance. Material resting on the surface of the screw is driven up the inclined face of the flight by frictional drag of the product on this rotating boundary layer. This motion of product is aided at the inlet region by further material entering the scoops. In practice, the formation of the boundary layer to prevent the fallback of product in the clearance between screw and casing is the first stage of the elevating process. The absence of a dynamic vortex of the product on the flight face and lack of ‘fallback’ in the casing are main distinguishing features between this apparatus and a conventional screw elevator and accounts for their enhanced elevating capacity and gentler handling characteristics.

Material forms a boundary layer on the wall at a lower rotational speed than that needed to create a product seal by centrifugal force alone. Two extra factors cause the material to hold against the casing wall and prevent it from falling down through the flight tip clearance. These are the pressure arising from the material being moved up the sloping face of the screw flight and also the fact that the bottom plate supports the base of the annulus layer lining the casing. The elevating capacity of the machine is determined by the inlet geometry, but is ultimately limited by the ability of the subsequent conveying section to transfer the product along the screw face. The crucial feature of helix angle is that the frictional drag imposed by shearing contact between the product resting on the screw flight surface and the rotating boundary layer must exceed the frictional resistance and lifting effort of the product sliding up the flight surface.

The lack of fallback means that bulk material is moved more coherently, and therefore more gently, and at a higher rate that in a normal screw elevator running at the same differential speed between the screw and the casing. Most machines made to date utilise twin scoops on the casing. This is superficially attractive as a symmetrical feature to avoid out-of-balance forces on the casing. A single scoop version offers advantages for more delicate handling, more sensitive feed control and to enlarge the swept pick-up area for difficult flow or larger particle size products. It is essential to ensure that the elevating capacity is not exceeded by the collecting mechanism, but optimisation needs to be tempered with a margin of safety to deal with variable product conditions.

Benefits of the Static Screw Elevating Approach

The benefits of static screw elevating include:

  • Performance is more predictable, more reliable, more product friendly, more product tolerant and much less maintenance prone than conventional elevators.
  • The pick up height is at the lowest point of the casing, and can be at virtually floor level.
  • Pick-up scoops give a positive, controlled input of material into the casing of the elevator. The transfer rate is volumetrically proportional to casing speed, so the machine can be used as a variable rate feeder.
  • The collection area extends to a swept diameter as the tip of the scoop(s), providing a relatively large effective flow channel to a mechanically extracted region.

The feed hopper can diverge from the scoop tips as a mass flow, expanded flow or a non-mass flow channel, to suit the nature of the bulk material being handled, thereby maximising the hopper holding capacity.

  • Feed material can be entered from any sector of the machine’s periphery.
  • As the discharge end has no bearings, seals or a drive, discharge can be close to the ultimate headroom.
  • The discharge can be divided into two or more sectors, with the discharge rate to each being directly proportional to the percentage of the casing periphery taken by the respective chutes.
  • There is virtually no limit to the length of the machine although a practical limit of 10m is recommended at present.
  • Bearings are totally external to the product flow and accessible for maintenance, if required.
  • The drive can be located at any position on the casing, to suit easy mounting, wiring and access.
  • The static screw allows the stiff casing tube to rotate without generating internal rotational forces on the screw or the product other than transfer by contact friction, so shear and dilated vortex motion in the conveyed product is reduced, therefore delicate products can be handled with little damage.
  • Fallback is prevented by product lining the casing, which also tends to centralise the screw and hold it from casing contact. This results in a higher conveying rate and less product damage than with standard screw elevators. (Smaller casing clearances may also be employed than with standard screws).

These benefits address many of the limitations that currently inhibit the selection of a screw elevator in some process applications. The static screw elevator is therefore expected to extend the scope of application of screw equipment to include duties for which a conventional screw elevator is not suitable of or cannot fit within the particular site constraints.

Static Screw Planning Considerations

When process engineers consider the benefits of the static screw elevator they have to note some drawbacks, which must be clearly identified to draw a balanced picture of its capabilities.

  • The construction is larger in cross section because of the framework needed to support the casing bearings.
  • The machine tends to retain more residual product at the end of a run than a conventional screw elevator, but it is easy to empty by removing the bottom plate.
  • The rotating casing has to be guarded where assessable by personnel.
  • The equipment presents a more cumbersome appearance than the simple tube of a conventional screw elevator.
  • Larger bearings are required to fit around the casing. Split bearings are convenient for maintenance, but relatively expensive.
  • The constructional features make the machine more expensive to manufacture than a standard screw elevator, however this is usually well offset by its advantageous features, improved reliability and performance. The self feeding aspect of the static screw saves any need for an additional screw feeder. Also when efficiency comparisons are made the static screw requires a smaller diameter screw and energy requirements are also significantly less.

For further information…

The static screw elevator is an important innovation that not only creates new opportunities for solids and bulk handling but also offers process engineers high levels of performance and reliability. Ajax Equipment has licensed the static screw elevator technology in the UK and has constructed two test and demonstration machines. For further details or a trial with the Static Screw Elevator contact Ajax Equipment on 01204 386723 or sales@ajax.co.uk.

In the US. contact Olds Elevator LLC at 978 887 2871 or sales@oldsusa.com

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
© 2006 Olds Elevator LLC, Boxford, Massachusetts